There is growing debate in Parliament about whether children under 16 should be banned from accessing mainstream social media platforms, following international moves such as Australia’s proposed restrictions. Supporters of tighter controls point to concerns about children’s safety, attention spans, and mental wellbeing, arguing that many digital spaces are designed to maximise engagement rather than support healthy development.

The discussion reflects a wider unease about unregulated online environments where algorithms, advertising and social comparison shape how young people spend their time.

But the debate raises a broader question: if access to mainstream social media is restricted, what should take its place?

This is where platforms like Learner Journey offer an alternative model.

Unlike traditional social media, Learner Journey is not built around likes, followers or infinite scrolling feeds. It is a purpose-driven learning platform designed for schools, colleges and structured learning communities. Every space is created with a clear educational purpose — such as reflection, collaboration, assessment or professional development — rather than open-ended social interaction.

Crucially, access is controlled. Learner Journey operates within closed, moderated environments where learners are invited by an institution, not exposed to the open internet. Teachers and leaders retain oversight, content is age-appropriate, and participation is directly linked to learning goals.

Where social media often encourages performance and comparison, Learner Journey focuses on progress. Learners can build portfolios, reflect through writing, audio or video, and receive structured feedback — without algorithmic amplification, advertising, or public metrics.

In this sense, the platform aligns closely with the aims behind the Parliamentary debate: reducing harm while preserving meaningful digital participation. It recognises that young people still need safe online spaces to collaborate, express themselves and develop digital skills — but not in environments optimised for attention capture.

As lawmakers consider potential restrictions, platforms like Learner Journey point to a middle path: not a withdrawal from digital life, but a shift towards supervised, educational spaces that put learning — not engagement metrics — first.

The question may not be whether under-16s should be online, but where — and under what conditions.